חברון
How חברון voted in 2022
215 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 88.37% 190 votes |
+77.5 |
| מחל Likud | 5.58% 12 votes |
−17.8 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 0.93% 2 votes |
−5.0 |
| שס Shas | 0.93% 2 votes |
−7.3 |
| כן National Unity | 0.47% 1 votes |
−8.6 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 0.47% 1 votes |
−4.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 3.26% | 7 | +2.1 |
What happened to these votes
7 people in חברון voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.26% here, 2.7 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
215 voters out of 338 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
חברון against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Avne Hefez · Shalwa · Rehelim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Avne Hefez | 1,044 |
| Shalwa | 351 |
| Rehelim | 363 |
| Itamar | 492 |
| Kefar Tappuah | 525 |
| Zimrat | 355 |
| Ma'ale Amos | 324 |
| Bne Dkalim | 625 |
10 elections in חברון
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 338 | 215 | 63.6% | −7.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 309 | 201 | 65.0% | −2.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 297 | 216 | 72.7% | +1.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 296 | 230 | 77.7% | +7.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 285 | 226 | 79.3% | +10.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 271 | 231 | 85.2% | +12.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 281 | 247 | 87.9% | +20.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 272 | 219 | 80.5% | +18.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 225 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 240 | 201 | 83.8% | +18.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.