Ro'i
How Ro'i voted in 2022
86 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 29.07% 25 votes |
+5.7 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 29.07% 25 votes |
+11.3 |
| כן National Unity | 20.93% 18 votes |
+11.9 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 9.30% 8 votes |
−1.5 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 4.65% 4 votes |
+1.0 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 1.16% 1 votes |
−3.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 3.49% | 3 | +0.3 |
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 1.16% | 1 | −0.0 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 1.16% | 1 | +0.9 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Ro'i voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.49% here, 1.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
86 voters out of 129 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ro'i against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ma'oz Hayyim · Nir Eliyyahu · Erez
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ma'oz Hayyim | 303 |
| Nir Eliyyahu | 314 |
| Erez | 321 |
| Deganya Alef | 338 |
| Ashdot Ya'aqov(Me'uhad) | 403 |
| Hulata | 349 |
| Ma'ale HaHamisha | 422 |
| Kefar HaHoresh | 374 |
10 elections in Ro'i
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 129 | 86 | 66.7% | −4.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 132 | 77 | 58.3% | −9.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 131 | 86 | 65.6% | −5.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 133 | 92 | 69.2% | −0.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 129 | 99 | 76.7% | +8.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 190 | 154 | 81.1% | +8.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 175 | 139 | 79.4% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 175 | 130 | 74.3% | +11.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 137 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 149 | 93 | 62.4% | −3.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.