Elqosh
How Elqosh voted in 2022
170 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 44.71% 76 votes |
+21.3 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 26.47% 45 votes |
+15.6 |
| שס Shas | 15.29% 26 votes |
+7.0 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 5.88% 10 votes |
−11.9 |
| כן National Unity | 4.71% 8 votes |
−4.4 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 1.18% 2 votes |
−2.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 1.18% | 2 | −2.0 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.59% | 1 | +0.3 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Elqosh voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.18% here, 0.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
170 voters out of 256 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Elqosh against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet Neqofa · Mesillat Ziyyon · Hagor
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet Neqofa | 368 |
| Mesillat Ziyyon | 579 |
| Hagor | 579 |
| Shoresh | 476 |
| En Sarid | 834 |
| Yuval | 338 |
| Bet Zayit | 809 |
| Bizzaron | 653 |
10 elections in Elqosh
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 256 | 170 | 66.4% | −4.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 245 | 141 | 57.6% | −9.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 242 | 148 | 61.2% | −10.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 258 | 170 | 65.9% | −4.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 256 | 160 | 62.5% | −6.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 265 | 174 | 65.7% | −6.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 257 | 146 | 56.8% | −11.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 250 | 176 | 70.4% | +7.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 155 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 232 | 169 | 72.8% | +7.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.