Megadim
How Megadim voted in 2022
633 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 29.38% 186 votes |
+6.0 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 26.54% 168 votes |
+8.8 |
| כן National Unity | 20.22% 128 votes |
+11.1 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 6.16% 39 votes |
−4.7 |
| שס Shas | 5.21% 33 votes |
−3.0 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 5.06% 32 votes |
+1.4 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 0.95% 6 votes |
−3.5 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 0.47% 3 votes |
−5.4 |
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 0.16% 1 votes |
−3.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 6 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 2.84% | 18 | −0.3 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 1.26% | 8 | +1.0 |
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 0.63% | 4 | −0.6 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.47% | 3 | +0.2 |
| צ | צעירים בוערים בהנהגת הדר מוכתר | 0.47% | 3 | +0.3 |
| אצ | חופש כלכלי בראשות אביר קארה | 0.16% | 1 | −0.2 |
What happened to these votes
18 people in Megadim voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.84% here, 0.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
634 voters out of 842 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Megadim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Megadim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 842 | 634 | 75.3% | +4.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 811 | 610 | 75.2% | +7.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 788 | 572 | 72.6% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 794 | 613 | 77.2% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 782 | 617 | 78.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 775 | 616 | 79.5% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 753 | 568 | 75.4% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 630 | 482 | 76.5% | +14.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 389 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 508 | 371 | 73.0% | +7.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.