Me'ir Shefeya
How Me'ir Shefeya voted in 2022
53 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 37.74% 20 votes |
+14.3 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 16.98% 9 votes |
−0.8 |
| כן National Unity | 15.09% 8 votes |
+6.0 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 11.32% 6 votes |
+6.8 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 9.43% 5 votes |
−1.4 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 5.66% 3 votes |
+2.0 |
| שס Shas | 1.89% 1 votes |
−6.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 1.89% | 1 | −1.3 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Me'ir Shefeya voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.89% here, 0.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
55 voters out of 128 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Me'ir Shefeya against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sede Warburg · Sarid · Kefar Rosh HaNiqra
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Sede Warburg | 733 |
| Sarid | 532 |
| Kefar Rosh HaNiqra | 742 |
| Shave Ziyyon | 625 |
| En Hod | 333 |
| Mizpe Aviv | 569 |
| Gilon | 670 |
| Me'ona | 480 |
10 elections in Me'ir Shefeya
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 128 | 55 | 43.0% | −27.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 115 | 58 | 50.4% | −17.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 112 | 54 | 48.2% | −23.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 118 | 63 | 53.4% | −16.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 106 | 54 | 50.9% | −17.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 92 | 49 | 53.3% | −19.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 99 | 52 | 52.5% | −15.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 95 | 40 | 42.1% | −20.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 39 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 97 | 43 | 44.3% | −21.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.