Ohad
How Ohad voted in 2009
153 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 28.76% 44 votes |
+7.1 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 26.80% 41 votes |
+4.3 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 26.14% 40 votes |
+16.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 10.46% 16 votes |
−1.2 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 3.92% 6 votes |
−4.6 |
| ו חד"ש החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ושיוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור ערבים ויהודים) | 1.31% 2 votes |
−2.0 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 1.31% 2 votes |
−1.6 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 0.65% 1 votes |
−2.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| חי | ישראל חזקה בראשות ד"ר אפרים סנה | 0.65% | 1 | +0.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
154 voters out of 222 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ohad against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Gan Hayyim · Shamir · Sede Warburg
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Gan Hayyim | 391 |
| Shamir | 393 |
| Sede Warburg | 593 |
| Ga'ash | 388 |
| Ben Ammi | 368 |
| Merhavya(Moshav) | 387 |
| Nir Dawid (Tel Amal) | 401 |
| Mizra | 465 |
10 elections in Ohad
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 280 | 200 | 71.4% | +0.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 266 | 181 | 68.0% | +0.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 267 | 185 | 69.3% | −2.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 257 | 173 | 67.3% | −2.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 253 | 187 | 73.9% | +5.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 243 | 187 | 77.0% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 231 | 163 | 70.6% | +2.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 222 | 154 | 69.4% | +6.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 140 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 206 | 145 | 70.4% | +4.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.