Dovev
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as דובב
How Dovev voted in 2022
247 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 62.35% 154 votes |
+38.9 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 13.77% 34 votes |
+2.9 |
| שס Shas | 13.36% 33 votes |
+5.1 |
| כן National Unity | 4.86% 12 votes |
−4.2 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 2.43% 6 votes |
−3.5 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 0.81% 2 votes |
−17.0 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 0.40% 1 votes |
−3.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 0.81% | 2 | −0.4 |
| ד | בל"ד - אלתג`מוע אלווטני אלדמוקרטי בראשות סמי אבו ש | 0.81% | 2 | −2.1 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 0.40% | 1 | −2.8 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
247 voters out of 357 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Dovev against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Berakha · Naham · Sede Dawid
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Berakha | 1,129 |
| Naham | 328 |
| Sede Dawid | 361 |
| Newe Mikha'el | 373 |
| Tifrah | 944 |
| Alma | 458 |
| Tarum | 494 |
| Bet Hilqiyya | 396 |
10 elections in Dovev
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 357 | 247 | 69.2% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 358 | 238 | 66.5% | −1.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 361 | 250 | 69.3% | −2.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 359 | 249 | 69.4% | −0.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 359 | 252 | 70.2% | +1.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 344 | 217 | 63.1% | −9.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 347 | 205 | 59.1% | −8.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 324 | 198 | 61.1% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 179 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 294 | 194 | 66.0% | +0.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.