Dovev
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as דובב
How Dovev voted in 2015
217 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 59.45% 129 votes |
+36.0 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 13.82% 30 votes |
+6.3 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 10.14% 22 votes |
+4.4 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 6.45% 14 votes |
−0.3 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 5.53% 12 votes |
−13.1 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 2.30% 5 votes |
−2.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.46% 1 votes |
−4.6 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 0.46% 1 votes |
−8.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 0.92% | 2 | −2.1 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.46% | 1 | −0.7 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
217 voters out of 344 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Dovev against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Rewaha · Ahi'ezer · Bet HaGaddi
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Rewaha | 332 |
| Ahi'ezer | 848 |
| Bet HaGaddi | 392 |
| Bareqet | 853 |
| HaZore'im | 390 |
| Pattish | 484 |
| Bene Re'em | 651 |
| Even Shemu'el | 519 |
10 elections in Dovev
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 357 | 247 | 69.2% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 358 | 238 | 66.5% | −1.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 361 | 250 | 69.3% | −2.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 359 | 249 | 69.4% | −0.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 359 | 252 | 70.2% | +1.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 344 | 217 | 63.1% | −9.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 347 | 205 | 59.1% | −8.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 324 | 198 | 61.1% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 179 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 294 | 194 | 66.0% | +0.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.