Ram-On
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as רםאון
How Ram-On voted in 2020
487 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 69.40% 338 votes |
+42.8 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 14.99% 73 votes |
+9.2 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 9.65% 47 votes |
−19.8 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 2.67% 13 votes |
−2.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.46% 12 votes |
−3.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.21% 1 votes |
−5.8 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.21% 1 votes |
−12.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כן | אני ואתה – מפלגת העם הישראלית | 0.21% | 1 | +0.2 |
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.21% | 1 | −0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
488 voters out of 652 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Ram-On against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Yas'ur · Sal'it · Bet Yehoshua
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Yas'ur | 391 |
| Sal'it | 628 |
| Bet Yehoshua | 534 |
| Mizra | 497 |
| Massu'ot Yizhaq | 383 |
| Shave Ziyyon | 612 |
| Tel Adashim | 650 |
| Ayyelet HaShahar | 585 |
10 elections in Ram-On
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 687 | 500 | 72.8% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 671 | 510 | 76.0% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 652 | 488 | 74.8% | +3.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 647 | 501 | 77.4% | +7.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 644 | 498 | 77.3% | +8.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 572 | 459 | 80.2% | +7.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 552 | 457 | 82.8% | +15.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 478 | 398 | 83.3% | +20.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 350 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 382 | 324 | 84.8% | +19.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.