Kefar Gid'on
How Kefar Gid'on voted in 2019
140 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 43.57% 61 votes |
+37.5 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 20.71% 29 votes |
−4.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 15.00% 21 votes |
+7.6 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 6.43% 9 votes |
−19.5 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 5.71% 8 votes |
−0.2 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 3.57% 5 votes |
−1.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.43% 2 votes |
−5.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 2.14% | 3 | +0.3 |
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 1.43% | 2 | +1.1 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Kefar Gid'on voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.14% here, 1.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.88%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
140 voters out of 182 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kefar Gid'on against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Kefar Gid'on
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 211 | 150 | 71.1% | +0.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 189 | 136 | 72.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 184 | 134 | 72.8% | +1.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 182 | 140 | 76.9% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 182 | 146 | 80.2% | +11.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 167 | 130 | 77.8% | +5.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 156 | 114 | 73.1% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 146 | 99 | 67.8% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 117 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 128 | 95 | 74.2% | +8.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.