Gan HaDarom
How Gan HaDarom voted in 2009
224 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 37.05% 83 votes |
+15.4 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 36.16% 81 votes |
+13.7 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 16.07% 36 votes |
+6.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.57% 8 votes |
−8.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 2.68% 6 votes |
−5.8 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 1.79% 4 votes |
−1.2 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 0.45% 1 votes |
−2.4 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 0.45% 1 votes |
−2.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 0.89% | 2 | +0.1 |
| זך | גיל – גימלאי ישראל לכנסת | 0.89% | 2 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
225 voters out of 287 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gan HaDarom against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Burgeta · Ramot Me'ir · Kefar Aviv
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Burgeta | 491 |
| Ramot Me'ir | 326 |
| Kefar Aviv | 379 |
| Kefar Harif | 352 |
| Newe Mivtah | 312 |
| En Ayyala | 437 |
| Nir Yisra'el | 384 |
| Yesud HaMa'ala | 670 |
10 elections in Gan HaDarom
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 344 | 268 | 77.9% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 350 | 266 | 76.0% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 356 | 291 | 81.7% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 346 | 277 | 80.1% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 342 | 275 | 80.4% | +11.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 304 | 264 | 86.8% | +14.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 300 | 240 | 80.0% | +12.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 287 | 225 | 78.4% | +15.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 207 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 278 | 209 | 75.2% | +9.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.