Kefar Silver
How Kefar Silver voted in 2020
34 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 52.94% 18 votes |
+26.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 26.47% 9 votes |
−3.0 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 11.76% 4 votes |
+5.9 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 2.94% 1 votes |
−2.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.94% 1 votes |
−2.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 2.94% | 1 | +2.5 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Kefar Silver voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.94% here, 7.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.42%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
34 voters out of 87 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kefar Silver against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Mishmar Ayyalon · She'ar Yashuv · Herev Le'Et
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Mishmar Ayyalon | 308 |
| She'ar Yashuv | 302 |
| Herev Le'Et | 413 |
| Avigedor | 484 |
| Ramot Naftali | 301 |
| Segulla | 327 |
| Orot | 317 |
| Ruhama | 352 |
10 elections in Kefar Silver
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 85 | 28 | 32.9% | −37.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 86 | 36 | 41.9% | −25.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 87 | 34 | 39.1% | −32.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 97 | 35 | 36.1% | −33.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 83 | 34 | 41.0% | −27.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 91 | 51 | 56.0% | −16.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 100 | 56 | 56.0% | −11.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 98 | 61 | 62.2% | −0.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 52 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 99 | 61 | 61.6% | −4.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.