Tushiyya
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as תושיה
How Tushiyya voted in 2013
180 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 69.44% 125 votes |
+60.3 |
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.33% 15 votes |
−15.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 6.11% 11 votes |
−2.6 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת, אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.56% 1 votes |
−4.6 |
| ד בל"ד - אלתג'מוע אלוותני אלדמוקרטי | 0.56% 1 votes |
−2.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 5 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי | 12.22% | 22 | +10.5 |
| פז | כח להשפיע בהכוונת רבי אמנון יצחק | 1.11% | 2 | +0.4 |
| פץ | כולנו חברים – נ נח | 0.56% | 1 | +0.5 |
| צק | צדק חברתי בראשות גד הרן | 0.56% | 1 | +0.5 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - הרשימה הליברלית | 0.56% | 1 | −0.6 |
What happened to these votes
22 people in Tushiyya voted for עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 12.22% here, 6.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.76%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
183 voters out of 208 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Tushiyya against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Tushiyya
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 362 | 273 | 75.4% | +4.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 337 | 258 | 76.6% | +9.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 316 | 254 | 80.4% | +8.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 317 | 247 | 77.9% | +8.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 322 | 262 | 81.4% | +12.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 260 | 227 | 87.3% | +15.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 208 | 183 | 88.0% | +20.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 152 | 134 | 88.2% | +25.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 123 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 106 | 95 | 89.6% | +24.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.