Kerem Beyavne
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as כרם יבנה (ישיבה) · כרם יבנה )ישיבה( · כרם יבנה ישיבה
How Kerem Beyavne voted in 2015
147 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 51.70% 76 votes |
+45.0 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 8.16% 12 votes |
+3.2 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 2.72% 4 votes |
−20.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 37.41% | 55 | +34.4 |
What happened to these votes
55 people in Kerem Beyavne voted for יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 37.41% here, 12.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 2.97%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
147 voters out of 162 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kerem Beyavne against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Tappuah · Bet Hilqiyya · Karme Zur
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Tappuah | 371 |
| Bet Hilqiyya | 328 |
| Karme Zur | 475 |
| Yizhar | 448 |
| Itamar | 398 |
| Revava | 715 |
| Sha'alvim | 526 |
| Dalton | 427 |
10 elections in Kerem Beyavne
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 138 | 117 | 84.8% | +14.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 154 | 124 | 80.5% | +13.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 157 | 144 | 91.7% | +20.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 157 | 139 | 88.5% | +18.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 158 | 140 | 88.6% | +20.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 162 | 147 | 90.7% | +18.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 151 | 137 | 90.7% | +23.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 173 | 152 | 87.9% | +25.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 164 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 213 | 173 | 81.2% | +15.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.