Ganne Hadar
How Ganne Hadar voted in 2003
94 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 29.79% 28 votes |
+15.3 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 27.66% 26 votes |
−1.7 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 23.40% 22 votes |
+11.1 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 12.77% 12 votes |
+7.6 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 1.06% 1 votes |
−4.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | חרות | 2.13% | 2 | +1.0 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 2.13% | 2 | +0.9 |
| רק | הירוקים | 1.06% | 1 | +0.7 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Ganne Hadar voted for חרות. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.13% here, 1.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.15%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
94 voters out of 124 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ganne Hadar against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet Zera · Allon HaGalil · HaGosherim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet Zera | 392 |
| Allon HaGalil | 330 |
| HaGosherim | 307 |
| Shave Ziyyon | 404 |
| Shamir | 345 |
| Kefar HaNasi | 304 |
| Sha'ar HaGolan | 356 |
| Kokhav Mikha'el | 311 |
10 elections in Ganne Hadar
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 286 | 226 | 79.0% | +8.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 274 | 211 | 77.0% | +9.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 258 | 202 | 78.3% | +6.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 256 | 203 | 79.3% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 248 | 197 | 79.4% | +11.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 229 | 187 | 81.7% | +9.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 213 | 159 | 74.6% | +6.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 191 | 144 | 75.4% | +12.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 119 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 124 | 94 | 75.8% | +10.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.