Poriyya-Newe Oved
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as פוריה נווה עובד
How Poriyya-Newe Oved voted in 2020
705 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 67.66% 477 votes |
+38.2 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 12.62% 89 votes |
−14.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 6.95% 49 votes |
−0.7 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 4.40% 31 votes |
−0.8 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 3.69% 26 votes |
−2.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.98% 21 votes |
−2.8 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.57% 4 votes |
−5.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.85% | 6 | +0.4 |
| יק | מפלגת הגוש התנ"כי | 0.14% | 1 | +0.1 |
| ץ | דעם כלכלה ירוקה מדינה אחת | 0.14% | 1 | +0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
708 voters out of 1,019 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Poriyya-Newe Oved against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Shetulim | 1,066 |
| Hosha'aya | 1,041 |
| Shahar | 387 |
| Gilat | 771 |
| Midrakh Oz | 411 |
| Ora | 601 |
| Azarya | 640 |
| Yad Rambam | 659 |
10 elections in Poriyya-Newe Oved
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 1,055 | 726 | 68.8% | −1.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 1,033 | 666 | 64.5% | −3.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 1,019 | 708 | 69.5% | −2.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 995 | 685 | 68.8% | −1.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 990 | 696 | 70.3% | +1.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 920 | 620 | 67.4% | −4.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 870 | 550 | 63.2% | −4.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 737 | 454 | 61.6% | −0.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 393 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 600 | 405 | 67.5% | +1.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.