Omen
How Omen voted in 2022
339 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 48.08% 163 votes |
+24.7 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 17.40% 59 votes |
+6.6 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 15.04% 51 votes |
−2.7 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 5.90% 20 votes |
+1.4 |
| שס Shas | 5.90% 20 votes |
−2.3 |
| כן National Unity | 5.31% 18 votes |
−3.8 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 0.59% 2 votes |
−5.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 0.59% | 2 | −0.6 |
| צ | צעירים בוערים בהנהגת הדר מוכתר | 0.59% | 2 | +0.4 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.29% | 1 | +0.0 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 0.29% | 1 | −2.9 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
339 voters out of 499 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Omen against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Even Shemu'el · Qeshet · Ahisamakh
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Even Shemu'el | 904 |
| Qeshet | 329 |
| Ahisamakh | 738 |
| Amqa | 452 |
| Kefar Ya'bez | 351 |
| Zanoah | 305 |
| Bene Re'em | 722 |
| Elifelet | 391 |
10 elections in Omen
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 499 | 339 | 67.9% | −2.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 413 | 266 | 64.4% | −3.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 367 | 231 | 62.9% | −8.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 355 | 221 | 62.3% | −7.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 347 | 209 | 60.2% | −8.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 299 | 177 | 59.2% | −13.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 276 | 150 | 54.3% | −13.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 262 | 148 | 56.5% | −6.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 136 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 236 | 159 | 67.4% | +1.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.