Omen
How Omen voted in 2003
156 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 26.28% 41 votes |
−3.1 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 25.00% 39 votes |
+19.5 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 21.79% 34 votes |
+9.5 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 9.62% 15 votes |
+1.4 |
| כן ישראל בעליה בראשות נתן שרנסקי | 6.41% 10 votes |
+4.3 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 3.85% 6 votes |
−10.6 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 3.21% 5 votes |
+0.4 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 1.92% 3 votes |
−3.3 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 1.28% 2 votes |
−2.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים | 0.64% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
159 voters out of 236 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Omen against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sarigim (Li-On) · Adi · Lohame HaGeta'ot
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sarigim (Li-On) | 342 |
| Adi | 731 |
| Lohame HaGeta'ot | 304 |
| Bene Ziyyon | 383 |
| Metula | 714 |
| Be'erotayim | 301 |
| Rinnatya | 363 |
| Newe Yamin | 505 |
10 elections in Omen
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 499 | 339 | 67.9% | −2.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 413 | 266 | 64.4% | −3.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 367 | 231 | 62.9% | −8.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 355 | 221 | 62.3% | −7.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 347 | 209 | 60.2% | −8.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 299 | 177 | 59.2% | −13.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 276 | 150 | 54.3% | −13.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 262 | 148 | 56.5% | −6.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 136 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 236 | 159 | 67.4% | +1.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.