Avivim
How Avivim voted in 2021
242 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 57.85% 140 votes |
+33.7 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 36.36% 88 votes |
+29.2 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 3.31% 8 votes |
−1.8 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 0.83% 2 votes |
−5.4 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.41% 1 votes |
−5.2 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 0.41% 1 votes |
−13.5 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 0.41% 1 votes |
−4.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ר | רפא – רק בריאות בראשות דוקטור אריה אבני | 0.41% | 1 | +0.0 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
243 voters out of 342 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Avivim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bne Dkalim · Yesodot · Tifrah
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bne Dkalim | 536 |
| Yesodot | 312 |
| Tifrah | 881 |
| Brukhin | 474 |
| Bet Hilqiyya | 390 |
| Yizhar | 564 |
| Itamar | 434 |
| Mattityahu | 346 |
10 elections in Avivim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 347 | 271 | 78.1% | +7.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 342 | 243 | 71.1% | +3.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 332 | 246 | 74.1% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 327 | 234 | 71.6% | +1.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 332 | 246 | 74.1% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 336 | 230 | 68.5% | −3.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 315 | 200 | 63.5% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 314 | 205 | 65.3% | +2.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 181 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 300 | 187 | 62.3% | −3.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.