Ne'ot HaKikkar
How Ne'ot HaKikkar voted in 2003
182 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 36.81% 67 votes |
+22.4 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 26.37% 48 votes |
−3.0 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 19.78% 36 votes |
+7.5 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 9.89% 18 votes |
+4.7 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 4.95% 9 votes |
+2.2 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 0.55% 1 votes |
−5.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 1.65% | 3 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Ne'ot HaKikkar voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.65% here, 1.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
183 voters out of 274 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ne'ot HaKikkar against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ma'anit · Kefar Szold · Kefar Blum
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ma'anit | 329 |
| Kefar Szold | 309 |
| Kefar Blum | 349 |
| Ma'oz Hayyim | 323 |
| Na'an | 750 |
| Rishpon | 457 |
| Midreshet Ben Gurion | 318 |
| Bet HaShitta | 611 |
10 elections in Ne'ot HaKikkar
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 225 | 146 | 64.9% | −5.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 220 | 143 | 65.0% | −2.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 221 | 136 | 61.5% | −10.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 214 | 149 | 69.6% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 211 | 147 | 69.7% | +1.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 198 | 136 | 68.7% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 189 | 133 | 70.4% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 275 | 160 | 58.2% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 188 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 274 | 183 | 66.8% | +1.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.