Elot
How Elot voted in 2009
146 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 38.36% 56 votes |
+28.4 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 30.82% 45 votes |
+8.4 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 12.33% 18 votes |
+9.4 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 11.64% 17 votes |
−10.0 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.74% 4 votes |
−9.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 1.37% 2 votes |
−7.1 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 0.68% 1 votes |
−2.2 |
| ו חד"ש החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ושיוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור ערבים ויהודים) | 0.68% 1 votes |
−2.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 0.68% | 1 | −0.1 |
| רק | הירוקים – למען ישראל ירוקה | 0.68% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
147 voters out of 262 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Elot against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Regba · Kefar Masaryk · Deganya Bet
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Regba | 522 |
| Kefar Masaryk | 373 |
| Deganya Bet | 306 |
| Ne'ot Mordekhay | 314 |
| Kefar Rosh HaNiqra | 514 |
| Timmorim | 399 |
| Kinneret(Qevuza) | 392 |
| Manof | 317 |
10 elections in Elot
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 276 | 169 | 61.2% | −9.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 265 | 169 | 63.8% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 253 | 164 | 64.8% | −6.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 251 | 164 | 65.3% | −4.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 249 | 164 | 65.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 266 | 166 | 62.4% | −9.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 261 | 179 | 68.6% | +0.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 262 | 147 | 56.1% | −6.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 157 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 252 | 183 | 72.6% | +7.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.