Addirim
How Addirim voted in 2013
155 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 45.16% 70 votes |
+36.4 |
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 25.16% 39 votes |
+1.8 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 15.48% 24 votes |
+6.4 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת, אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 2.58% 4 votes |
−2.6 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 2.58% 4 votes |
−11.7 |
| כן הישראלים | 1.29% 2 votes |
−0.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ץ | עם שלם - בהכוונת הרב חיים אמסלם | 3.87% | 6 | +2.7 |
| נץ | עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי | 1.94% | 3 | +0.2 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - הרשימה הליברלית | 1.29% | 2 | +0.1 |
| ז | ארץ חדשה – החזית להפלת שלטון ההון בראשות אלדד יניב ורני בלייר | 0.65% | 1 | −0.1 |
What happened to these votes
6 people in Addirim voted for עם שלם - בהכוונת הרב חיים אמסלם. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.87% here, 3.2 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
155 voters out of 188 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Addirim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Addirim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 235 | 177 | 75.3% | +4.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 234 | 180 | 76.9% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 233 | 183 | 78.5% | +7.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 230 | 191 | 83.0% | +13.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 230 | 175 | 76.1% | +7.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 209 | 163 | 78.0% | +5.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 188 | 155 | 82.4% | +14.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 196 | 154 | 78.6% | +16.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 153 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 208 | 166 | 79.8% | +14.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.