Zur Natan
How Zur Natan voted in 2009
148 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 41.89% 62 votes |
+19.4 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 31.76% 47 votes |
+10.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 13.51% 20 votes |
+1.8 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 5.41% 8 votes |
−4.5 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 2.03% 3 votes |
−0.8 |
| ו חד"ש החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ושיוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור ערבים ויהודים) | 2.03% 3 votes |
−1.3 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 1.35% 2 votes |
−1.6 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 0.68% 1 votes |
−2.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 0.68% | 1 | −0.1 |
| זך | גיל – גימלאי ישראל לכנסת | 0.68% | 1 | +0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
148 voters out of 206 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Zur Natan against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sha'ar HaGolan · Evron · HaMa'pil
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sha'ar HaGolan | 369 |
| Evron | 457 |
| HaMa'pil | 316 |
| Be'er Toviyya | 456 |
| Kabri | 524 |
| Misgav Dov | 327 |
| Ma'barot | 549 |
| Nahalal | 443 |
10 elections in Zur Natan
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 228 | 157 | 68.9% | −1.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 225 | 170 | 75.6% | +8.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 228 | 166 | 72.8% | +1.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 228 | 169 | 74.1% | +4.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 230 | 172 | 74.8% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 215 | 171 | 79.5% | +7.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 207 | 155 | 74.9% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 206 | 148 | 71.8% | +9.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 127 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 188 | 135 | 71.8% | +6.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.