Paran
How Paran voted in 2022
267 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה Yesh Atid | 43.45% 116 votes |
+25.7 |
| כן National Unity | 26.22% 70 votes |
+17.1 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 13.48% 36 votes |
+9.8 |
| מחל Likud | 5.24% 14 votes |
−18.2 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 1.87% 5 votes |
−9.0 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 0.37% 1 votes |
−4.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 8.99% | 24 | +5.8 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 0.37% | 1 | +0.1 |
What happened to these votes
24 people in Paran voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 8.99% here, 2.8 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
267 voters out of 398 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Paran against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ramat Dawid · Qoranit · Nahalal
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ramat Dawid | 305 |
| Qoranit | 468 |
| Nahalal | 618 |
| Lahav | 378 |
| Gat(Qibbuz) | 437 |
| Bet HaEmeq | 371 |
| Shamir | 488 |
| Yizre'el | 352 |
10 elections in Paran
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 398 | 267 | 67.1% | −3.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 385 | 278 | 72.2% | +4.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 370 | 260 | 70.3% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 366 | 260 | 71.0% | +1.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 364 | 276 | 75.8% | +7.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 363 | 271 | 74.7% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 349 | 257 | 73.6% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 344 | 235 | 68.3% | +5.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 215 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 293 | 188 | 64.2% | −1.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.