Paran
How Paran voted in 2019
260 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 65.77% 171 votes |
+39.8 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 14.62% 38 votes |
+9.8 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 10.00% 26 votes |
+5.7 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 3.46% 9 votes |
−21.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.08% 8 votes |
−3.9 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 0.77% 2 votes |
−5.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 2.31% | 6 | +2.0 |
What happened to these votes
6 people in Paran voted for צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.31% here, 6.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.33%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
260 voters out of 366 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Paran against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Yiftah · Gazit · Ramat HaShofet
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Yiftah | 370 |
| Gazit | 455 |
| Ramat HaShofet | 509 |
| Talme Yafe | 359 |
| Bet HaEmeq | 351 |
| Gevat | 559 |
| Sharona | 346 |
| Shamir | 498 |
10 elections in Paran
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 398 | 267 | 67.1% | −3.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 385 | 278 | 72.2% | +4.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 370 | 260 | 70.3% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 366 | 260 | 71.0% | +1.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 364 | 276 | 75.8% | +7.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 363 | 271 | 74.7% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 349 | 257 | 73.6% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 344 | 235 | 68.3% | +5.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 215 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 293 | 188 | 64.2% | −1.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.