Ashalim
How Ashalim voted in 2020
299 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 42.47% 127 votes |
+15.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 27.42% 82 votes |
−2.0 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 13.38% 40 votes |
+7.6 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 7.36% 22 votes |
+2.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 6.02% 18 votes |
+0.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.00% 3 votes |
−5.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.00% 3 votes |
−6.7 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.67% 2 votes |
−12.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.67% | 2 | +0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
300 voters out of 409 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Ashalim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Yad Natan · Ben Shemen (Moshav) · HaSolelim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Yad Natan | 323 |
| Ben Shemen (Moshav) | 465 |
| HaSolelim | 535 |
| Ge'a | 423 |
| Bet El'azari | 823 |
| Kefar Aviv | 411 |
| Avi'ezer | 445 |
| Giv'on HaHadasha | 706 |
10 elections in Ashalim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 437 | 305 | 69.8% | −0.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 435 | 292 | 67.1% | −0.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 409 | 300 | 73.3% | +1.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 390 | 284 | 72.8% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 387 | 292 | 75.5% | +7.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 303 | 227 | 74.9% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 295 | 197 | 66.8% | −1.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 225 | 144 | 64.0% | +1.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 105 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 135 | 81 | 60.0% | −5.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.