Tuval
How Tuval voted in 2021
193 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 34.20% 66 votes |
+28.1 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 19.69% 38 votes |
+15.1 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 19.69% 38 votes |
+5.8 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 5.18% 10 votes |
−1.0 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 4.66% 9 votes |
−19.5 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 4.15% 8 votes |
−2.5 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.63% 7 votes |
−2.0 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 3.63% 7 votes |
−1.1 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, תע"ל, בל"ד) | 3.11% 6 votes |
−1.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 1.04% | 2 | +0.2 |
| ר | רפא – רק בריאות בראשות דוקטור אריה אבני | 1.04% | 2 | +0.6 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Tuval voted for הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.04% here, 1.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.79%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
194 voters out of 299 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Tuval against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Tuval
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 324 | 196 | 60.5% | −10.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 299 | 194 | 64.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 379 | 252 | 66.5% | −5.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 371 | 252 | 67.9% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 374 | 246 | 65.8% | −2.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 323 | 223 | 69.0% | −3.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 281 | 194 | 69.0% | +1.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 242 | 161 | 66.5% | +4.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 182 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 200 | 127 | 63.5% | −2.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.