Zviyya
How Zviyya voted in 2020
198 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 71.21% 141 votes |
+44.6 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 15.66% 31 votes |
+9.8 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.08% 16 votes |
−21.4 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 2.02% 4 votes |
−3.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.52% 3 votes |
−4.2 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.51% 1 votes |
−12.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | קול הנשים | 1.01% | 2 | +0.9 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Zviyya voted for קול הנשים. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.01% here, 16.7 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.06%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
198 voters out of 268 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Zviyya against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Allon HaGalil · Nir Eliyyahu · Kefar Szold
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Allon HaGalil | 613 |
| Nir Eliyyahu | 301 |
| Kefar Szold | 377 |
| Enat | 474 |
| Kefar Yedidya | 398 |
| Dan | 379 |
| Ma'yan Barukh | 334 |
| Ma'ale HaHamisha | 413 |
10 elections in Zviyya
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 270 | 190 | 70.4% | −0.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 271 | 198 | 73.1% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 268 | 198 | 73.9% | +2.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 267 | 184 | 68.9% | −1.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 265 | 203 | 76.6% | +8.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 233 | 179 | 76.8% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 241 | 185 | 76.8% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 214 | 160 | 74.8% | +12.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 152 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 168 | 137 | 81.5% | +15.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.