Mizpe Netofa
How Mizpe Netofa voted in 2022
484 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 39.46% 191 votes |
+28.6 |
| כן National Unity | 16.94% 82 votes |
+7.9 |
| מחל Likud | 11.57% 56 votes |
−11.8 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 7.02% 34 votes |
−10.8 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 1.45% 7 votes |
−2.2 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 1.03% 5 votes |
−4.8 |
| שס Shas | 1.03% 5 votes |
−7.2 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 0.21% 1 votes |
−4.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 6 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 19.63% | 95 | +18.4 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 0.62% | 3 | −2.5 |
| אצ | חופש כלכלי בראשות אביר קארה | 0.41% | 2 | +0.1 |
| נץ | העצמאים החדשים בראשות יורם מועלמי | 0.21% | 1 | +0.2 |
| קי | הלב היהודי בראשות אלי יוסף | 0.21% | 1 | +0.2 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 0.21% | 1 | −0.1 |
What happened to these votes
95 people in Mizpe Netofa voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 19.63% here, 16.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
488 voters out of 680 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Mizpe Netofa against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Tequma · Hosha'aya · Giv'at Koah
10 elections in Mizpe Netofa
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 680 | 488 | 71.8% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 665 | 494 | 74.3% | +6.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 637 | 471 | 73.9% | +2.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 637 | 479 | 75.2% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 636 | 499 | 78.5% | +10.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 551 | 440 | 79.9% | +7.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 475 | 379 | 79.8% | +12.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 394 | 323 | 82.0% | +19.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 259 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 260 | 211 | 81.2% | +15.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.