Gornot HaGalil
How Gornot HaGalil voted in 2015
107 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 32.71% 35 votes |
+9.3 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 20.56% 22 votes |
+1.9 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 14.02% 15 votes |
+8.3 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 13.08% 14 votes |
+5.6 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 6.54% 7 votes |
−2.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 3.74% 4 votes |
−1.3 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 2.80% 3 votes |
−3.9 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.87% 2 votes |
−3.2 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 1.87% 2 votes |
−2.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 1.87% | 2 | +0.7 |
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 0.93% | 1 | −2.0 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Gornot HaGalil voted for עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.87% here, 1.7 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.12%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
107 voters out of 159 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gornot HaGalil against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Gornot HaGalil
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 199 | 126 | 63.3% | −7.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 176 | 109 | 61.9% | −5.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 165 | 108 | 65.5% | −6.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 164 | 106 | 64.6% | −5.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 169 | 115 | 68.0% | −0.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 159 | 107 | 67.3% | −5.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 153 | 80 | 52.3% | −15.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 165 | 97 | 58.8% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 94 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 138 | 65 | 47.1% | −18.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.