Abbirim
How Abbirim voted in 2022
150 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה Yesh Atid | 29.33% 44 votes |
+11.5 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 19.33% 29 votes |
+15.6 |
| כן National Unity | 8.00% 12 votes |
−1.1 |
| מחל Likud | 4.00% 6 votes |
−19.4 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 2.67% 4 votes |
−1.8 |
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 2.00% 3 votes |
−1.8 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 2.00% 3 votes |
−8.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 25.33% | 38 | +22.2 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 6.00% | 9 | +5.7 |
| אצ | חופש כלכלי בראשות אביר קארה | 0.67% | 1 | +0.3 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.67% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
38 people in Abbirim voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 25.33% here, 8.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
152 voters out of 235 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Abbirim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Dan · Geva · Kefar Yedidya
10 elections in Abbirim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 235 | 152 | 64.7% | −5.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 221 | 151 | 68.3% | +0.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 210 | 160 | 76.2% | +4.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 195 | 135 | 69.2% | −0.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 193 | 153 | 79.3% | +10.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 160 | 123 | 76.9% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 162 | 127 | 78.4% | +10.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 140 | 110 | 78.6% | +16.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 86 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 91 | 74 | 81.3% | +15.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.