Abbirim
How Abbirim voted in 2019
135 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 47.41% 64 votes |
+21.5 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 35.56% 48 votes |
+31.2 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 9.63% 13 votes |
+4.8 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 2.22% 3 votes |
−22.9 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 1.48% 2 votes |
−4.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.48% 2 votes |
−5.5 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.48% 2 votes |
−6.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.74% | 1 | −1.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
135 voters out of 195 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Abbirim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Zofit · En HaNaziv · HaMa'pil
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Zofit | 593 |
| En HaNaziv | 311 |
| HaMa'pil | 472 |
| Be'erotayim | 539 |
| Even Sappir | 361 |
| HaHoterim | 444 |
| Bet Lehem HaGelilit | 462 |
| Bet Yehoshua | 532 |
10 elections in Abbirim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 235 | 152 | 64.7% | −5.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 221 | 151 | 68.3% | +0.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 210 | 160 | 76.2% | +4.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 195 | 135 | 69.2% | −0.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 193 | 153 | 79.3% | +10.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 160 | 123 | 76.9% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 162 | 127 | 78.4% | +10.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 140 | 110 | 78.6% | +16.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 86 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 91 | 74 | 81.3% | +15.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.