Sede Avraham
How Sede Avraham voted in 2020
186 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 64.52% 120 votes |
+37.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 13.44% 25 votes |
−16.0 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 8.06% 15 votes |
+2.2 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 7.53% 14 votes |
+2.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 5.38% 10 votes |
−0.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.54% 1 votes |
−7.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.54% | 1 | +0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
186 voters out of 251 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Sede Avraham against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: En HaBesor · Hazor-Ashdod · Kefar Bialik
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| En HaBesor | 537 |
| Hazor-Ashdod | 483 |
| Kefar Bialik | 336 |
| Talme Yafe | 371 |
| Bene Deror | 782 |
| Kokhav Mikha'el | 514 |
| Ne'ot Mordekhay | 364 |
| Kefar Hittim | 344 |
10 elections in Sede Avraham
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 264 | 169 | 64.0% | −6.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 259 | 187 | 72.2% | +4.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 251 | 186 | 74.1% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 250 | 179 | 71.6% | +1.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 250 | 184 | 73.6% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 226 | 166 | 73.5% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 198 | 143 | 72.2% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 179 | 123 | 68.7% | +6.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 93 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 133 | 85 | 63.9% | −1.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.