Talme Yosef
How Talme Yosef voted in 2003
82 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 31.71% 26 votes |
+17.2 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 21.95% 18 votes |
−7.4 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 18.29% 15 votes |
+6.0 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 17.07% 14 votes |
+11.9 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 2.44% 2 votes |
−3.1 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 1.22% 1 votes |
−1.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 4.88% | 4 | +3.7 |
| נ | ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים | 2.44% | 2 | +2.2 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Talme Yosef voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.88% here, 4.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
82 voters out of 162 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Talme Yosef against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Szold · Ma'anit · Kefar Blum
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Szold | 309 |
| Ma'anit | 329 |
| Kefar Blum | 349 |
| Ma'oz Hayyim | 323 |
| Midreshet Ben Gurion | 318 |
| Moledet | 358 |
| Ramat HaShofet | 320 |
| Dorot | 308 |
10 elections in Talme Yosef
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 275 | 167 | 60.7% | −9.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 271 | 165 | 60.9% | −6.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 269 | 156 | 58.0% | −13.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 264 | 163 | 61.7% | −8.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 257 | 174 | 67.7% | −0.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 237 | 166 | 70.0% | −2.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 238 | 162 | 68.1% | +0.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 206 | 135 | 65.5% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 106 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 162 | 82 | 50.6% | −15.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.