Harish
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as קציר-חריש
How Harish voted in 2003
1,313 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 29.32% 385 votes |
−0.1 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 17.67% 232 votes |
+5.4 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 16.98% 223 votes |
+2.5 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 8.38% 110 votes |
+3.2 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 8.23% 108 votes |
+2.7 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 7.08% 93 votes |
−1.1 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 2.59% 34 votes |
−1.6 |
| כן ישראל בעליה בראשות נתן שרנסקי | 2.28% 30 votes |
+0.1 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 1.90% 25 votes |
−0.9 |
| ו החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ולשוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור יהודים וערבים) והתנועה הערבית להתחדשות | 0.38% 5 votes |
−2.6 |
| ד בלי"ד (ברית לאומית דמוקרטית) | 0.30% 4 votes |
−2.0 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.23% 3 votes |
−4.1 |
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת | 0.15% 2 votes |
−1.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 10 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 2.13% | 28 | +0.9 |
| נץ | חרות | 0.76% | 10 | −0.4 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.61% | 8 | +0.2 |
| צף | הברית הלאומית המתקדמת - מפלגת האחדות הלאומית | 0.23% | 3 | −0.4 |
| קך | אזרח ומדינה | 0.23% | 3 | +0.2 |
| ז | זעם צדק חברתי | 0.15% | 2 | +0.1 |
| נ | ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים | 0.15% | 2 | −0.1 |
| ט | מפלגת זכויות הגבר במשפחה - רעייש | 0.08% | 1 | +0.0 |
| ק | ארגון הפעולה הדמוקרטי - דעי"ם | 0.08% | 1 | +0.0 |
| קץ | ל.ה.ב.ה | 0.08% | 1 | +0.0 |
What happened to these votes
28 people in Harish voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.13% here, 1.8 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
1,337 voters out of 1,895 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Harish against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sajur · Julis · Kisra-Sumei
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sajur | 1,117 |
| Julis | 2,206 |
| Kisra-Sumei | 1,988 |
| Mizpe Ramon | 2,132 |
| En Harod (Ihud) | 382 |
| Yirka | 4,008 |
| Bene Ayish | 3,601 |
| Qazrin | 2,811 |
10 elections in Harish
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 17,269 | 12,330 | 71.4% | +0.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 10,902 | 7,402 | 67.9% | +0.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 7,109 | 5,160 | 72.6% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 5,749 | 4,292 | 74.7% | +4.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 4,542 | 3,392 | 74.7% | +6.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 604 | 415 | 68.7% | −3.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 578 | 403 | 69.7% | +2.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 2,243 | 1,524 | 67.9% | +5.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 1,404 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 1,895 | 1,337 | 70.6% | +4.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.
Name changes
As they appear in the Central Elections Committee's own results:
- קציר-חריש → חריש, first in the 19th Knesset election (2013); before that in the 16th
This is a direct observation of the source documents: the name the locality was recorded under in each election. It bounds when the change took effect, but does not record the legal decision behind it.