En Tamar
How En Tamar voted in 2022
98 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה Yesh Atid | 34.69% 34 votes |
+16.9 |
| כן National Unity | 24.49% 24 votes |
+15.4 |
| מחל Likud | 23.47% 23 votes |
+0.1 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 7.14% 7 votes |
−3.7 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 4.08% 4 votes |
+0.4 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 2.04% 2 votes |
−2.4 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 1.02% 1 votes |
−4.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 3.06% | 3 | +1.9 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in En Tamar voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.06% here, 2.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
98 voters out of 158 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
En Tamar against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Talme Yehi'el · Kefar Hittim · Rannen
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Talme Yehi'el | 462 |
| Kefar Hittim | 346 |
| Rannen | 344 |
| Ganne Yohanan | 391 |
| Netiv HaShayyara | 309 |
| Bet Uzzi'el | 367 |
| Shahar | 375 |
| Midrakh Oz | 408 |
8 elections in En Tamar
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 158 | 98 | 62.0% | −8.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 148 | 96 | 64.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 147 | 95 | 64.6% | −6.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 144 | 79 | 54.9% | −15.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 143 | 94 | 65.7% | −2.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 140 | 105 | 75.0% | +2.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 124 | 96 | 77.4% | +9.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 115 | 78 | 67.8% | +5.3 | The results → |