Korazim
How Korazim voted in 2020
216 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 57.87% 125 votes |
+31.3 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 18.52% 40 votes |
+12.7 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 13.89% 30 votes |
−15.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.24% 7 votes |
−2.5 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 2.78% 6 votes |
−2.5 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 2.31% 5 votes |
−3.7 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.46% 1 votes |
−12.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | עוצמה ליברלית – כלכלית בראשות גלעד אלפר | 0.46% | 1 | +0.4 |
| נ | קול הנשים | 0.46% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
216 voters out of 336 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Korazim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Nir Banim · Kefar Daniyyel · Qevuzat Yavne
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Nir Banim | 443 |
| Kefar Daniyyel | 362 |
| Qevuzat Yavne | 433 |
| Dvir | 490 |
| En Harod (Ihud) | 376 |
| Manof | 460 |
| Kefar Bin Nun | 414 |
| Tel Yizhaq | 515 |
10 elections in Korazim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 345 | 226 | 65.5% | −5.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 338 | 218 | 64.5% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 336 | 216 | 64.3% | −7.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 339 | 225 | 66.4% | −3.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 336 | 247 | 73.5% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 333 | 233 | 70.0% | −2.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 327 | 233 | 71.3% | +3.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 338 | 239 | 70.7% | +8.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 227 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 288 | 206 | 71.5% | +5.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.