Massad
How Massad voted in 2009
243 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 45.68% 111 votes |
+35.8 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 33.74% 82 votes |
+11.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 6.17% 15 votes |
−5.5 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 5.76% 14 votes |
−15.8 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 3.29% 8 votes |
+0.3 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 1.65% 4 votes |
−1.2 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 1.23% 3 votes |
−7.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.82% 2 votes |
−3.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 0.82% | 2 | +0.0 |
| רק | הירוקים – למען ישראל ירוקה | 0.82% | 2 | +0.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
246 voters out of 344 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Massad against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Mesillat Ziyyon · Bet El'azari · Neta'im
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Mesillat Ziyyon | 401 |
| Bet El'azari | 643 |
| Neta'im | 301 |
| Yoqne'am(Moshava) | 675 |
| Gan Ner | 1,080 |
| Avi'el | 335 |
| Bet Zayit | 663 |
| Ora | 442 |
10 elections in Massad
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 382 | 284 | 74.3% | +3.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 384 | 286 | 74.5% | +7.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 370 | 266 | 71.9% | +0.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 384 | 268 | 69.8% | −0.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 385 | 295 | 76.6% | +8.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 364 | 278 | 76.4% | +4.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 380 | 261 | 68.7% | +0.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 344 | 246 | 71.5% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 194 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 232 | 168 | 72.4% | +6.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.