Kefar Weradim
How Kefar Weradim voted in 2006
2,783 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם אהוד אולמרט לראשות הממשלה | 32.95% 917 votes |
+10.9 |
| אמת העבודה-מימד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 26.27% 731 votes |
+11.2 |
| מרצ מרצ - ישראל חברתית דמוקרטית | 12.76% 355 votes |
+9.0 |
| זך גימלאי ישראל לכנסת | 8.12% 226 votes |
+2.2 |
| מחל הליכוד עם בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 4.92% 137 votes |
−4.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.38% 94 votes |
−5.6 |
| טב איחוד לאומי - מפד"ל רשימה יהודית לאומית מאוחדת | 2.34% 65 votes |
−4.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 0.90% 25 votes |
−8.6 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.43% 12 votes |
−4.3 |
| ו חד"ש - החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ולשוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור יהודים וערבים) | 0.32% 9 votes |
−2.4 |
| ד אלתג׳מוע אלוותני אל דימוקרטי - בל״ד | 0.07% 2 votes |
−2.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 13 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| רק | היירוקים – לאיכות הסביבה והחיים בישראל | 2.66% | 74 | +1.1 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 1.90% | 53 | +0.6 |
| פ | תפנית בראשות עוזי דיין | 1.33% | 37 | +0.7 |
| חץ | חץ - תנועה חילונית ציונית בראשות אברהם פורז | 0.72% | 20 | +0.4 |
| כ | חזית יהודית לאומית בראשות ברוך מרזל | 0.36% | 10 | −0.4 |
| יש | שינוי – המפלגה האזרחית של ישראל | 0.14% | 4 | −0.0 |
| נץ | חרות | 0.14% | 4 | +0.1 |
| פץ | מפלגה למלחמה בבנקים | 0.11% | 3 | +0.0 |
| ה | ברית עולם | 0.04% | 1 | −0.0 |
| זה | עתיד אחד - עתיד טוב לישראל | 0.04% | 1 | −0.4 |
| ף | לידר | 0.04% | 1 | +0.0 |
| צה | הציונות החדשה | 0.04% | 1 | −0.0 |
| קז | צדק לכל - רע"ש | 0.04% | 1 | −0.1 |
What happened to these votes
74 people in Kefar Weradim voted for היירוקים – לאיכות הסביבה והחיים בישראל. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.66% here, 1.8 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.52%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
The Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality for this election, so there is no turnout. It is not calculated or estimated: it is simply missing.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
The result here moved on average 1.24 percentage points from the national swing, across 8 elections. The full ranking →
Kefar Weradim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Metula · Lehavim · Bet Yizhaq-Sh. Hefer
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Metula | 693 |
| Lehavim | 2,817 |
| Bet Yizhaq-Sh. Hefer | 1,009 |
| Aseret | 584 |
| Ramat Yishay | 2,657 |
| Rosh Pinna | 1,227 |
| Pardesiyya | 2,899 |
| Mazkeret Batya | 3,879 |
10 elections in Kefar Weradim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 4,780 | 3,162 | 66.2% | −4.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 4,708 | 3,259 | 69.2% | +1.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 4,632 | 3,242 | 70.0% | −1.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 4,673 | 3,312 | 70.9% | +1.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 4,664 | 3,452 | 74.0% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 4,400 | 3,287 | 74.7% | +2.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 4,435 | 3,321 | 74.9% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 4,205 | 3,071 | 73.0% | +10.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 2,809 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 3,412 | 2,536 | 74.3% | +8.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.