bechirot.fyi
My town · locality code 1268

Metar

How Metar voted in 2003

3,198 valid votes.

List ShareAgainst national
מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה 31.71%
1,014 votes
+2.3
אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע 24.89%
796 votes
+10.4
יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים 15.57%
498 votes
+3.3
ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל 8.19%
262 votes
+4.0
מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר 7.54%
241 votes
+2.3
ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה 2.66%
85 votes
−2.9
ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ 2.35%
75 votes
−0.4
שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה 1.66%
53 votes
−6.6
כן ישראל בעליה בראשות נתן שרנסקי 0.50%
16 votes
−1.7
ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה 0.47%
15 votes
−3.8
ו החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ולשוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור יהודים וערבים) והתנועה הערבית להתחדשות 0.09%
3 votes
−2.9

"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.

Show 7 more lists that did not enter the Knesset

These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.

קנ עלה ירוק 1.69% 54 +0.5
נ ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים 1.00% 32 +0.8
נץ חרות 0.97% 31 −0.2
רק הירוקים 0.47% 15 +0.1
זנ אהבת ישראל בנשיאות גדול המקובלים הרב כדורי 0.13% 4 −0.0
פה המרכז - תנועה חברתית לאומית בראשות דוד מגן 0.09% 3 +0.0
צף הברית הלאומית המתקדמת - מפלגת האחדות הלאומית 0.03% 1 −0.6

What happened to these votes

54 people in Metar voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.

The list took 1.69% here, 1.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.

Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.

Turnout · 2003 76.7% +11.1 against the national average

3,219 voters out of 4,198 eligible.

On the political map The full map →

The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.

The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.

As a predictor of the national result 50 of 135

The result here moved on average 0.82 percentage points from the national swing, across 10 elections. The full ranking →

Compare

Metar against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.

For example: Metula · Shoham · Adi

Most similar in how they vote

The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).

Metula 714
Shoham 6,412
Adi 731
Oranit 2,478
Pardesiyya 2,696
Kokhav Ya'ir 2,810
Lappid 844
Giv'at Avni 743

10 elections in Metar

KnessetEligibleVoters TurnoutAgainst national
25th 2022 8,021 5,806 72.4% +1.8 The results →
24th 2021 7,551 5,523 73.1% +5.7 The results →
23rd 2020 7,161 5,320 74.3% +2.8 The results →
22nd 2019 6,968 5,184 74.4% +4.5 The results →
21st 2019 6,718 5,155 76.7% +8.3 The results →
20th 2015 5,734 4,412 76.9% +4.6 The results →
19th 2013 5,479 4,184 76.4% +8.6 The results →
18th 2009 5,076 3,730 73.5% +11.0 The results →
17th 2006 Not in source 3,453 Not in source Not in source The results →
16th 2003 4,198 3,219 76.7% +11.1 The results →
Turnout Metar  National
About the missing row

In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.

Source: the Central Elections Committee's publications. National turnout is calculated from the snapshot itself, including external envelopes. Sources · How it is built