Ramat Rahel
How Ramat Rahel voted in 2022
283 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה Yesh Atid | 41.34% 117 votes |
+23.6 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 16.25% 46 votes |
+12.6 |
| כן National Unity | 13.78% 39 votes |
+4.7 |
| מחל Likud | 10.60% 30 votes |
−12.8 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 3.18% 9 votes |
−1.3 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 2.47% 7 votes |
−8.4 |
| שס Shas | 2.12% 6 votes |
−6.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 6 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 8.13% | 23 | +5.0 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 0.71% | 2 | +0.4 |
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 0.35% | 1 | −0.8 |
| ד | בל"ד - אלתג`מוע אלווטני אלדמוקרטי בראשות סמי אבו ש | 0.35% | 1 | −2.6 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.35% | 1 | +0.1 |
| ף | הפיראטים- הכי טוב לדעתי אני רוצה להיות שם | 0.35% | 1 | +0.3 |
What happened to these votes
23 people in Ramat Rahel voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 8.13% here, 2.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
283 voters out of 359 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ramat Rahel against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Ramat Rahel
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 359 | 283 | 78.8% | +8.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 356 | 288 | 80.9% | +13.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 354 | 290 | 81.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 358 | 284 | 79.3% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 357 | 284 | 79.6% | +11.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 322 | 259 | 80.4% | +8.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 320 | 246 | 76.9% | +9.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 311 | 226 | 72.7% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 225 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 270 | 194 | 71.9% | +6.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.