Avshalom
How Avshalom voted in 2021
162 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 41.98% 68 votes |
+36.3 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 22.22% 36 votes |
−2.0 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 11.73% 19 votes |
−2.2 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 6.17% 10 votes |
+1.4 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 5.56% 9 votes |
−0.7 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 5.56% 9 votes |
+1.0 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 3.70% 6 votes |
−2.9 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 1.85% 3 votes |
−4.2 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.62% 1 votes |
−5.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.62% | 1 | −0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
165 voters out of 278 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Avshalom against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Masaryk · Gan Shelomo · Gal'on
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Masaryk | 426 |
| Gan Shelomo | 331 |
| Gal'on | 326 |
| Allonim | 396 |
| Nezer Sereni | 502 |
| Mikhmoret | 735 |
| Nizzanim | 308 |
| Mishmeret | 522 |
10 elections in Avshalom
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 308 | 199 | 64.6% | −6.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 278 | 165 | 59.4% | −8.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 250 | 158 | 63.2% | −8.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 247 | 157 | 63.6% | −6.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 240 | 147 | 61.2% | −7.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 205 | 142 | 69.3% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 170 | 112 | 65.9% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 143 | 93 | 65.0% | +2.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 80 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 104 | 71 | 68.3% | +2.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.