Demeide
How Demeide voted in 2003
90 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת | 50.00% 45 votes |
+47.9 |
| ו החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ולשוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור יהודים וערבים) והתנועה הערבית להתחדשות | 14.44% 13 votes |
+11.5 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 7.78% 7 votes |
−6.7 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 5.56% 5 votes |
−23.8 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 2.22% 2 votes |
−2.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | זעם צדק חברתי | 20.00% | 18 | +20.0 |
What happened to these votes
18 people in Demeide voted for זעם צדק חברתי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 20.00% here, 704.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.03%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
91 voters out of 149 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Demeide against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kamane · Ein Naqquba · Reihaniyye
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kamane | 358 |
| Ein Naqquba | 384 |
| Reihaniyye | 403 |
| Ghajar | 377 |
| Meiser | 380 |
| Kudayrat as-Sani' | 316 |
| Aramsha | 372 |
| נווה אפעל | 420 |
10 elections in Demeide
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 352 | 187 | 53.1% | −17.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 333 | 163 | 48.9% | −18.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 318 | 239 | 75.2% | +3.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 315 | 200 | 63.5% | −6.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 315 | 153 | 48.6% | −19.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 268 | 188 | 70.1% | −2.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 254 | 132 | 52.0% | −15.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 218 | 115 | 52.8% | −9.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 128 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 149 | 91 | 61.1% | −4.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.