Ramat Dawid
How Ramat Dawid voted in 2015
267 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 64.79% 173 votes |
+46.1 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 10.86% 29 votes |
+6.9 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 8.61% 23 votes |
−0.2 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 5.99% 16 votes |
−17.4 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 3.75% 10 votes |
−3.7 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 3.00% 8 votes |
−3.7 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"מ, בל"ד, תע"ל) | 0.37% 1 votes |
−10.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.37% 1 votes |
−4.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.75% | 2 | −0.4 |
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 0.75% | 2 | −2.2 |
| זך | תומכי מפלגת הדמוקראטורה | 0.37% | 1 | +0.4 |
| זץ | Unsourced | 0.37% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
269 voters out of 347 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Ramat Dawid against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Mishmar Dawid · Maggal · Dan
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Mishmar Dawid | 311 |
| Maggal | 597 |
| Dan | 356 |
| Meshar | 375 |
| Mishmar HaSharon | 344 |
| En Gev | 317 |
| Kefar Hayyim | 326 |
| Bet Zera | 402 |
10 elections in Ramat Dawid
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 404 | 305 | 75.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 375 | 292 | 77.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 360 | 286 | 79.4% | +7.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 355 | 288 | 81.1% | +11.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 348 | 280 | 80.5% | +12.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 347 | 269 | 77.5% | +5.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 315 | 282 | 89.5% | +21.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 388 | 238 | 61.3% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 239 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 364 | 235 | 64.6% | −1.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.