Mahane Tali
How Mahane Tali voted in 2022
80 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 26.25% 21 votes |
+2.8 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 23.75% 19 votes |
+6.0 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 20.00% 16 votes |
+9.2 |
| כן National Unity | 13.75% 11 votes |
+4.7 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 6.25% 5 votes |
+2.6 |
| שס Shas | 3.75% 3 votes |
−4.5 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 1.25% 1 votes |
−3.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 3.75% | 3 | +2.6 |
| אצ | חופש כלכלי בראשות אביר קארה | 1.25% | 1 | +0.9 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Mahane Tali voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.75% here, 3.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
81 voters out of 154 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Mahane Tali against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Talme Yafe · Eshbol · Yad Natan
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Talme Yafe | 386 |
| Eshbol | 338 |
| Yad Natan | 306 |
| Magen Sha'ul | 329 |
| Sede Zevi | 337 |
| Liman | 386 |
| Nir Aqiva | 326 |
| Even Sappir | 368 |
9 elections in Mahane Tali
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 154 | 81 | 52.6% | −18.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 153 | 65 | 42.5% | −25.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 155 | 96 | 61.9% | −9.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 165 | 85 | 51.5% | −18.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 159 | 109 | 68.6% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 167 | 110 | 65.9% | −6.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 162 | 98 | 60.5% | −7.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 162 | 117 | 72.2% | +9.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 75 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.