Devora
How Devora voted in 2009
141 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 40.43% 57 votes |
+18.0 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 21.99% 31 votes |
+12.1 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 18.44% 26 votes |
−3.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 6.38% 9 votes |
−5.3 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 4.26% 6 votes |
−4.2 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 2.84% 4 votes |
−0.1 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 2.13% 3 votes |
−0.7 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 2.13% 3 votes |
−1.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זך | גיל – גימלאי ישראל לכנסת | 0.71% | 1 | +0.2 |
| ק | דעם – מפלגת פועלים בראשות אסמא אגבארייה זחאלקה | 0.71% | 1 | +0.6 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
141 voters out of 234 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Devora against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ahituv · Petahya · Newe Yamin
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ahituv | 402 |
| Petahya | 391 |
| Newe Yamin | 599 |
| En Sarid | 592 |
| Sede Eli'ezer | 324 |
| Ahuzzat Baraq | 678 |
| Menahemya | 522 |
| Mazliah | 540 |
10 elections in Devora
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 226 | 139 | 61.5% | −9.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 221 | 143 | 64.7% | −2.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 228 | 157 | 68.9% | −2.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 230 | 165 | 71.7% | +1.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 230 | 161 | 70.0% | +1.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 219 | 163 | 74.4% | +2.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 228 | 164 | 71.9% | +4.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 234 | 141 | 60.3% | −2.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 144 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 214 | 140 | 65.4% | −0.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.