Ayanot
How Ayanot voted in 2003
27 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 33.33% 9 votes |
+3.9 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 18.52% 5 votes |
+4.1 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 18.52% 5 votes |
+13.3 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 14.81% 4 votes |
+2.5 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 7.41% 2 votes |
+4.7 |
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת | 3.70% 1 votes |
+1.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| רק | הירוקים | 3.70% | 1 | +3.3 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Ayanot voted for הירוקים. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.70% here, 9.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.41%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
27 voters out of 54 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ayanot against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ramat HaKovesh · Nir Yizhaq · HaMa'pil
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Ramat HaKovesh | 380 |
| Nir Yizhaq | 341 |
| HaMa'pil | 301 |
| Kefar Menahem | 361 |
| Dafna | 386 |
| Hazor-Ashdod | 394 |
| Hanni'el | 347 |
| Ga'ash | 343 |
10 elections in Ayanot
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 146 | 46 | 31.5% | −39.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 129 | 42 | 32.6% | −34.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 115 | 50 | 43.5% | −28.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 136 | 53 | 39.0% | −30.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 109 | 53 | 48.6% | −19.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 88 | 52 | 59.1% | −13.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 77 | 54 | 70.1% | +2.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 65 | 34 | 52.3% | −10.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 33 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 54 | 27 | 50.0% | −15.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.