Giv'olim
How Giv'olim voted in 2013
171 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 42.11% 72 votes |
+18.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 20.47% 35 votes |
+11.7 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 12.87% 22 votes |
+3.7 |
| כן הישראלים | 11.11% 19 votes |
+9.0 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 3.51% 6 votes |
−10.8 |
| צפ התנועה בראשות ציפי לבני | 2.34% 4 votes |
−2.6 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת, אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.17% 2 votes |
−4.0 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות שלי יחימוביץ' | 0.58% 1 votes |
−10.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| פז | כח להשפיע בהכוונת רבי אמנון יצחק | 4.09% | 7 | +3.4 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - הרשימה הליברלית | 1.17% | 2 | +0.0 |
| נץ | עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי | 0.58% | 1 | −1.2 |
What happened to these votes
7 people in Giv'olim voted for כח להשפיע בהכוונת רבי אמנון יצחק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.09% here, 5.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.74%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
173 voters out of 234 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Giv'olim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Giv'olim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 316 | 261 | 82.6% | +12.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 308 | 237 | 76.9% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 296 | 249 | 84.1% | +12.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 300 | 238 | 79.3% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 293 | 239 | 81.6% | +13.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 258 | 216 | 83.7% | +11.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 234 | 173 | 73.9% | +6.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 217 | 145 | 66.8% | +4.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 140 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 193 | 151 | 78.2% | +12.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.