Yardena
How Yardena voted in 2009
159 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 29.56% 47 votes |
+19.6 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 27.04% 43 votes |
+5.4 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 17.61% 28 votes |
−4.9 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 10.06% 16 votes |
+1.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 7.55% 12 votes |
−4.1 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 5.03% 8 votes |
+2.2 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.63% 1 votes |
−3.8 |
| ד אלתג'מוע אלוטני אלדמוקרטי – בל"ד | 0.63% 1 votes |
−1.9 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 0.63% 1 votes |
−2.7 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 0.63% 1 votes |
−2.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.63% | 1 | +0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
161 voters out of 270 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Yardena against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Poriyya-Newe Oved · Nevatim · Migdal
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Poriyya-Newe Oved | 453 |
| Nevatim | 349 |
| Migdal | 618 |
| Yad Rambam | 485 |
| Yagel | 348 |
| Kefar Tappuah | 381 |
| Ma'galim | 469 |
| Pedaya | 302 |
10 elections in Yardena
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 283 | 220 | 77.7% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 277 | 201 | 72.6% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 285 | 213 | 74.7% | +3.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 285 | 206 | 72.3% | +2.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 282 | 203 | 72.0% | +3.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 286 | 198 | 69.2% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 273 | 164 | 60.1% | −7.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 270 | 161 | 59.6% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 180 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 272 | 180 | 66.2% | +0.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.