Bet Oved
How Bet Oved voted in 2003
204 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 46.08% 94 votes |
+31.6 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 20.59% 42 votes |
+15.4 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 14.22% 29 votes |
−15.2 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 13.24% 27 votes |
+1.0 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 1.47% 3 votes |
−1.3 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 0.98% 2 votes |
−3.2 |
| כן ישראל בעליה בראשות נתן שרנסקי | 0.98% 2 votes |
−1.2 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 0.49% 1 votes |
−5.0 |
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת | 0.49% 1 votes |
−1.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים | 0.49% | 1 | +0.3 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.49% | 1 | −0.7 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.49% | 1 | +0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
205 voters out of 255 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Bet Oved against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ginnaton · Bizzaron · Mishmar HaNegev
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ginnaton | 321 |
| Bizzaron | 461 |
| Mishmar HaNegev | 368 |
| Bet Herut | 327 |
| Giv'at Hayyim (Ihud) | 536 |
| Bazra | 360 |
| Yagur | 777 |
| Be'eri | 532 |
10 elections in Bet Oved
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 255 | 186 | 72.9% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 254 | 191 | 75.2% | +7.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 250 | 187 | 74.8% | +3.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 249 | 190 | 76.3% | +6.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 239 | 180 | 75.3% | +6.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 267 | 225 | 84.3% | +11.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 251 | 204 | 81.3% | +13.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 259 | 192 | 74.1% | +11.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 209 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 255 | 205 | 80.4% | +14.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.